Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assistive Technology Service Delivery Outcome Assessment: From Challenges to Standards

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Disability

  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

This entry provides an introduction to the key elements necessary to understand the issues related to assistive technology (AT) service delivery outcome assessment. Focusing mainly on work conducted in English-speaking countries (i.e., USA, Australia) and Europe, the ambition of this chapter is not to comprehensively review the extant literature on this multifaceted topic, but to provide an introduction to its key elements that might be accessible to a wider readership. The entry first introduces the reader to the concepts of AT service delivery and outcome assessment. It goes on to illustrate some of the main reasons or challenges that have hindered the AT field from achieving consensus on what should be considered an outcome and how to adequately measure it. It then presents relevant contributions that attempt to model the outcome assessment process and identify key indicators for its measurement. The role of the AT user in any assessment process is discussed in light of a rights-based approach to AT service delivery. The entry lastly focuses on recent proposals to standardize the outcome assessment process in order to achieve a global consensus on the need to collect reliable data on the effectiveness of AT service delivery processes worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrich, R., Norman, G., Mavrou, K., Roentgen, U., Daniels, R., Desideri, L., et al. (2019). Towards a global quality framework for assistive technology service delivery. Global Perspectives on Assistive Technology, 2(2), 263–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe [AAATE]. (2012). Service delivery systems for assistive technology in Europe – Position Paper. Available online at: https://aaate.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2016/02/ATServiceDelivery_PositionPaper.pdf. Last accessed 25 Sept 2023.

  • Association for Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe [AAATE]. (2019). Standards in support of assistive technology and accessibility – Important but hard to find. Report from the AAATE/SIG workshop on Standardisation (S13N) in Bologna, August 2019. Available online at https://aaate.net/2019/11/22/standards-in-support-of-assistive-technology-and-accessibility-important-but-hard-to-find/. Last accessed 25 Sept 2023.

  • Association for Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe [AAATE]. (2023). Towards WHO Global guidelines on the provision of assistive technology – Journeying together. Abstract of the policy session promoted by the WHO, GAATO and GDI Hub. In 17th International Conference of the AAATE, AAATE2023 Paris, August 30 – September 1, 2023. Available online at https://aaate2023.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2023/08/BookOfAbstracts-Prelim.pdf. Last accessed 25 Sept 2023.

  • ATOMS Project. (2007). ATOMS Project Report 2001–2006. Available online at http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/about/execsummary2001-2006/executivesummary.html. Last accessed 26 Sept 2023.

  • Bauer, S., Elsaesser, L. J., Scherer, M., Sax, C., & Arthanat, S. (2014). Promoting a standard for assistive technology service delivery. Technology and Disability, 26(1), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, J., Larsson, S., Östergren, P. O., Rahman, A. S. M., Bari, N., & Khan, A. H. M. (2012). User involvement in service delivery predicts outcomes of assistive technology use: A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgnis, F., Pigini, L., Ramella, M., Salatino, C., Saruggia, M., Folini, C., & Converti, R. M. (2022). Assessing the outcome of mobility assistive technology (OMAT) in daily living: Preliminary results in an Italian sample. In The international conference on computers helping people with special needs (pp. 534–541). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borgnis, F., Salatino, C., Desideri, L., & Converti, R. M. (2023). A systematic review of available assistive technology outcome measures. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, B. E. (2001). Assistive technology assessment: a comparative analysis of five models. Paper presented at the CSUN Conference on Technology and People with Disabilities, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A., & Hussey, S. (1995). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice. Mosby Year Book, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A., & Hussey, S. (2002). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). Mosby, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A., & Miller Polgar, J. (2008). Cook & Hussey’s assistive technologies: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). Mosby Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ruyter, F. (1995). Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: Do we understand the commitment? Assistive Technology, 7(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ruyter, F. (1997). The importance of outcome measures for assistive technology service delivery systems. Technology and Disability, 6(1-2), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Witte, L., Knops, H., Pyfers, L., et al. (1994). European service delivery systems in rehabilitation technology. Drukkerskollektief. (IRV, editor).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Witte, L., Steel, E., Gupta, S., et al. (2018). Assistive technology provision: Towards an international framework for assuring availability and accessibility of affordable high-quality assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 467–472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desideri, L., Salatino, C., Pigini, L., Andrich, R., Cristofani, R., Bravi, S., et al. (2019). Using a standard procedure to assess assistive technology service delivery outcomes: A proposal from the Italian network of independent assistive technology centres. Global Perspectives on Assistive Technology, 269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edyburn, D. L., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Creating an assistive technology outcomes measurement system: Validating the components. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1(1), 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S., & Scherer, M. (Eds.). (2017). Assistive technology assessment handbook. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S., Meloni, F., & Borsci, S. (2016). The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: A survey of users of the National Health Service. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 52(4), 516–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, M. J. (2001). Assistive technology outcomes research: Challenges met and yet unmet. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80(7), 528–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, M. J., Jutai, J. W., Scherer, M. J., & DeRuyter, F. (2003). A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(22), 1243–1251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García, T. P., Scherer, M., Jiménez, E., Díez, E., Marcos, N. R., & García, T. P. (2019). Improving assistive technology services through outcome measures and global knowledge sharing in order to make the best match of person and technology. Global Perspectives on Assistive Technology, 233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelderblom, G. J., & de Witte, L. P. (2002). The assessment of assistive technology outcomes, effects and costs. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giesbrecht, E. D. (2013). Application of the human activity assistive technology model for occupational therapy research. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 60(4), 230–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Global Alliance of AT Organisations [GAATO]. (2022). GAATO AT Outcomes Grand Challenge Consultation. GAATO. https://www.gaato.org/grand-challenges.

  • Hammel, J., Southall, K., Jutai, J., Finlayson, M., Kashindi, G., & Fok, D. (2013). Evaluating use and outcomes of mobility technology: A multiple stakeholder analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8(4), 294–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jutai, J. W., Fuhrer, M. J., Demers, L., Scherer, M. J., & DeRuyter, F. (2005). Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(4), 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, N., Spann, A., Khan, M., Contepomi, S., Hoogerwerf, E. J., & de Witte, L. (2023a). Scoping review of quality guidelines for Assistive Technology provision. Available online at https://at2030.org/static/at2030_core/outputs/GAATO_Service_Provision_added_content_re_2023_Guideline.pdf. Last accessed 25 Sept 2023.

  • Layton, N., Callaway, L., Wilson, E., Bell, D., Prain, M., Noonan, M., et al. (2023b). My assistive technology outcomes framework: Rights-based outcome tools for consumers to ‘measure what matters’ (pp. 1–9). Assistive Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenker, J. A., & Paquet, V. L. (2003). A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology, 15(1), 1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenker, J. A., & Paquet, V. L. (2004). A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology, 16(1), 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenker, J. A., Koester, H. H., & Smith, R. O. (2021). Toward a national system of assistive technology outcomes measurement. Assistive Technology, 33(1), 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLachlan, M., Banes, D., Bell, D., Borg, J., Donnelly, B., Fembek, M., et al. (2018). Assistive technology policy: A position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 454–466.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. K., Martin, L. G., Stumbo, N. J., & Morrill, J. H. (2011). The impact of consumer involvement on satisfaction with and use of assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(3), 225–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, H., Carmien, S., & Lewis, A. (2018). Assistive technology abandonment: research realities and potentials. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs: 16th International Conference, ICCHP 2018, Linz, Austria, July 11-13, 2018, Proceedings, Part II 16 (pp. 532–540). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B., & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5, 36–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Satisfaction with assistive technology: What are we measuring? Poster presented at the RESNA 27th International Conference on Technology & Disability: Research, Design, Practice & Policy, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M. J. (1996). Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation, 18(9), 439–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M. J. (1998). Matching person & technology: A series of assessments for evaluating predispositions to and outcomes of technology use in rehabilitation, education, the workplace & other settings. Institute for Matching Person & Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M. J. (2002). The change in emphasis from people to person: Introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1-3), 1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M. J. (2017). Technology adoption, acceptance, satisfaction and benefit: Integrating various assistive technology outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(1), 1–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M. J., & Craddock, G. (2002). Matching person & technology (MPT) assessment process. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M. J., & McKee, B. G. (1989). But will the assistive technology device be used? Proceedings of the 12th annual conference: Technology for the Next Decade (pp. 356–357). RESNA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M., Smith, R. O., Layton, N., & Scherer, M. (2019). Committing to assistive technology outcomes and synthesizing practice, research and policy. Global Perspectives on Assistive Technology, 196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. O. (1996a). Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: Challenge and innovation. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 71–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. O. (1996b). Introduction. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 69–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. O. (2000). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in education. Diagnostique, 25(4), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. O. (2016). The emergence and emergency of assistive technology outcomes research methodology. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits, 10(1), 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. O., Scherer, M. J., Cooper, R., Bell, D., Hobbs, D. A., Pettersson, C., et al. (2018a). Assistive technology products: A position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 473–485.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. M., Gowran, R. J., Mannan, H., Donnelly, B., Alvarez, L., Bell, D., et al. (2018b). Enabling appropriate personnel skill-mix for progressive realization of equitable access to assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 445–453.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara, A. T., Ramos, V. D., Alfieri, F. M., & Battistella, L. R. (2018). Abandonment of assistive products: Assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(7), 716–723.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tebbutt, E., Brodmann, R., Borg, J., MacLachlan, M., Khasnabis, C., & Horvath, R. (2016). Assistive products and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Globalization and Health, 12(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trachtmann, L. (1994). Outcome measures: Are we ready to answer the tough questions? Assistive Technology, 6, 91–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss-Lambrou, R. (2002). Satisfaction and comfort. In M. J. Scherer (Ed.), Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation (pp. 77–94). American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, R., Dijcks, B., Soede, M., Gelderblom, G. J., & De Witte, L. (2003). Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technology and Disability, 15(4), 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund [WHO & UNICEF]. (2022). Global report on assistive technology. World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund. Available online at https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049451. [Last accessed 26 Sept 2023].

  • World Health Organization [WHO]. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF. (2001). World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization [WHO]. (2017). Global priority research agenda for improving access to high-quality affordable assistive technology. World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization [WHO]. (2018). Seventy-first World Health Assembly. Resolutions and decisions annexes. World Health Organization. Available online at https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA71-REC1/A71_2018_REC1-en.pdf. [Last accessed 26 Sept 2023].

  • World Health Organization [WHO]. (2023). Access to assistive technology: the global situation and role of pharmacy. Presentation at WHO technical briefing seminar on medicines and health products, 10 May 2023, Geneva. Available online at https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/health-products-policy-and-standards/18_access-to-assistive-technology-the-global-situation-and-role-of-pharmacy%2D%2D-kylie-shae%2D%2D-irene-calvo.pdf?sfvrsn=a531888b_1. Last accessed 26 Sept 2023.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AIAS Bologna Onlus, Bologna, Italy

    Lorenzo Desideri

  2. Regional Center for Assistive Technology, Bologna, Italy

    Lorenzo Desideri

  3. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy

    Claudia Salatino & Francesca Borgnis

Authors
  1. Lorenzo Desideri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claudia Salatino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesca Borgnis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Desideri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. c/o Dr. Matthew Bennett, Klemzig, SA, Australia

    Gabriel Bennett

  2. Positive Partnerships, Seaford, SA, Australia

    Emma Goodall

Section Editor information

  1. No affiliation provided

    Gabriel Bennett

  2. No affiliation provided

    Emma Goodall

  3. No affiliation provided

    Stefano Federici

  4. No affiliation provided

    Marcia J. Scherer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Desideri, L., Salatino, C., Borgnis, F. (2024). Assistive Technology Service Delivery Outcome Assessment: From Challenges to Standards. In: Bennett, G., Goodall, E. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Disability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8_49-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8_49-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40858-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40858-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation